Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(snapshot): prevent an integer overflow when calculating TSC scaling #4606

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2024

Conversation

pb8o
Copy link
Contributor

@pb8o pb8o commented May 7, 2024

Because we are using u32 integer math when checking the TSC, it could happen that the value can overflow if the TSC value is very high, around 18GHz. While there is no processor on the market near that frequency, it's worth fixing this in case the snapshot gets corrupted somehow.

Changes

...

Reason

To make the snapshot implementation more robust

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

  • If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
  • The description of changes is clear and encompassing.
  • Any required documentation changes (code and docs) are included in this
    PR.
  • API changes follow the Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
  • User-facing changes are mentioned in CHANGELOG.md.
  • All added/changed functionality is tested.
  • New TODOs link to an issue.
  • Commits meet
    contribution quality standards.

  • This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

@pb8o pb8o added Priority: Medium Indicates than an issue or pull request should be resolved ahead of issues or pull requests labelled Status: Awaiting author Indicates that an issue or pull request requires author action labels May 7, 2024
@pb8o pb8o self-assigned this May 7, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.13%. Comparing base (252e85e) to head (1893b5a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4606   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.13%   82.13%           
=======================================
  Files         255      255           
  Lines       31268    31269    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        25683    25684    +1     
  Misses       5585     5585           
Flag Coverage Δ
4.14-c5n.metal 79.63% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
4.14-c7g.metal ?
4.14-m5n.metal 79.62% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
4.14-m6a.metal 78.84% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
4.14-m6g.metal 76.69% <ø> (ø)
4.14-m6i.metal 79.61% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
4.14-m7g.metal 76.69% <ø> (?)
5.10-c5n.metal 82.15% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-c7g.metal ?
5.10-m5n.metal 82.13% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
5.10-m6a.metal 81.44% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6g.metal 79.46% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6i.metal 82.13% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7g.metal 79.46% <ø> (?)
6.1-c5n.metal 82.15% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m5n.metal 82.13% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m6a.metal 81.44% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
6.1-m6g.metal 79.45% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6i.metal 82.13% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7g.metal 79.46% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Because we are using u32 integer math when checking the TSC, it could
happen that the value can overflow if the TSC value is very high, around
18GHz. While there is no processor on the market near that frequency,
it's worth fixing this in case the snapshot gets corrupted somehow.

Signed-off-by: Pablo Barbáchano <pablob@amazon.com>
@pb8o pb8o merged commit 2bbbf0f into firecracker-microvm:main May 7, 2024
7 checks passed
@pb8o pb8o deleted the fix-tsc-overflow branch May 7, 2024 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority: Medium Indicates than an issue or pull request should be resolved ahead of issues or pull requests labelled Status: Awaiting author Indicates that an issue or pull request requires author action
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants