Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

javascript object in autocompelete suggestions #1751

Closed
hamuz opened this issue Sep 30, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

javascript object in autocompelete suggestions #1751

hamuz opened this issue Sep 30, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Verified and replicated bugs and issues. fixed Bugs that are fixed (in a coming release).

Comments

@hamuz
Copy link
Contributor

hamuz commented Sep 30, 2018

Bug description
I am running Firefly III version 4.7.7@DEMO

(please give a clear and concise description of what the bug is)

Steps to reproduce
What do you need to do to trigger this bug?

  1. Go to https://demo.firefly-iii.org/transactions/show/629
  2. Link transaction: type in 669, and wait for auto complete
    image

Expected behavior
What do you expect to see after those steps?
Transaction name, and not some object's "toString"

Bonus points
Earn bonus points by:

  • Post a stacktrace from your log files
  • Add a screenshot
@JC5
Copy link
Member

JC5 commented Sep 30, 2018

Nice find. I've pushed a fix to the develop branch.

@JC5 JC5 added bug Verified and replicated bugs and issues. fixed Bugs that are fixed (in a coming release). labels Sep 30, 2018
JC5 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2018
@JC5
Copy link
Member

JC5 commented Sep 30, 2018

And another one. I've rewritten some JS so do a hard refresh.

@JC5 JC5 closed this as completed in d4c763d Oct 28, 2018
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Verified and replicated bugs and issues. fixed Bugs that are fixed (in a coming release).
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants