Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: use consistent binary dest path naming #4772

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jamilbk
Copy link
Member

@jamilbk jamilbk commented Apr 24, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
firezone ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 24, 2024 7:34pm

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Terraform Cloud Plan Output

Plan: 15 to add, 14 to change, 15 to destroy.

Terraform Cloud Plan

@ReactorScram
Copy link
Collaborator

Waiting to see what the CI output looks like

Copy link
Collaborator

@ReactorScram ReactorScram left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Performance Test Results

TCP

Test Name Received/s Sent/s Retransmits
direct-tcp-client2server 240.4 MiB (+2%) 241.8 MiB (+2%) 311 (+34%)
direct-tcp-server2client 244.5 MiB (+2%) 245.9 MiB (+2%) 229 (-1%)
relayed-tcp-client2server 230.5 MiB (-3%) 231.5 MiB (-3%) 288 (-2%)
relayed-tcp-server2client 233.1 MiB (-1%) 233.9 MiB (-1%) 445 (-0%)

UDP

Test Name Total/s Jitter Lost
direct-udp-client2server 50.0 MiB (-0%) 0.04ms (-28%) 0.00% (NaN%)
direct-udp-server2client 50.0 MiB (-0%) 0.01ms (-7%) 0.00% (NaN%)
relayed-udp-client2server 50.0 MiB (-0%) 0.05ms (+1%) 0.00% (NaN%)
relayed-udp-server2client 50.0 MiB (-0%) 0.01ms (+111%) 0.00% (NaN%)

@jamilbk
Copy link
Member Author

jamilbk commented Apr 24, 2024

CI is green now 🤞

Copy link
Collaborator

@ReactorScram ReactorScram left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like it might work. That's a lot more places to put versions in, though.

Comment on lines -10 to -12
cp ../target/release/firezone "$BINARY_DEST_PATH"-amd64
cp ../target/release/firezone-gui-client.dwp "$BINARY_DEST_PATH"-amd64.dwp
cp ../target/release/bundle/deb/*_amd64.deb "$BINARY_DEST_PATH"_amd64.deb
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the deb having an underscore where the other ones had a hyphen was just a convention, and Debian won't actually care if we break that, so this should be okay.

@jamilbk jamilbk added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 24, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Apr 24, 2024
@jamilbk jamilbk added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 24, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit af066dc Apr 24, 2024
134 checks passed
@jamilbk jamilbk deleted the ci/fix-release-naming-scripts branch April 24, 2024 20:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants