Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add returnables to receipt case definitions for DE #71

Merged
merged 17 commits into from Jun 17, 2020
Merged

Add returnables to receipt case definitions for DE #71

merged 17 commits into from Jun 17, 2020

Conversation

christian-rogobete
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@christian-rogobete christian-rogobete changed the title Add returnables in receipt case definitions for DE Add returnables to receipt case definitions for DE May 6, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@AxelKutschera AxelKutschera left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I propose - contrary to my remarks - to delete this chapter completely or to shorten it considerably and to replace it with concrete json-examples.
Why? These explanations on this document would have to be much more extensive and examples need not be complete but only exemplary.

Comment on lines 12 to 16
From a VAT point of view refering to the income from returnables (DE: Pfand), a distinction must be made here as to whether a transport container provided against a separately agreed deposit is a (self-contained) transport aid or merely a so-called goods container. Whereas transport aids basically serve to simplify the transport and storage of goods (e.g. pallets, boxes), goods are enclosed in inner/outer containers which are necessary for the delivery of the goods to the end consumer (e.g. bottles).

From the point of view of turnover tax, the provision of transport aids against a deposit represents an independent delivery which is subject to the general tax rate according to § 12 Abs. 1 UStG (currently 7% VAT).

In contrast, the encirclement of goods, as a so-called dependent secondary service, shares the fate of the actual main service/product. (e.g. delivery of milk 7% VAT - deposit on milk bottle also 7% VAT).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done, pls. have a look to the current version

@christian-rogobete christian-rogobete self-assigned this May 22, 2020
@christian-rogobete christian-rogobete added the in progress This issue is already in progress to be resolved. label May 22, 2020
…ete/interface-doc into de-rc-returnable

* 'de-rc-returnable' of https://github.com/christain-rogobete/interface-doc: (59 commits)
  Update appendix-de-kassensichv.md
  add vouchers to toc for DE
  add voucher postman collection for DE
  update DE voucher examples
  Update reference-tables.md
  Updated middleware 1.3.1 release notes
  Update data-structures.md
  Update data-structures.md
  Update data-structures.md
  Update data-structures.md
  Added ManagerId as ftReceiptCaseDataField
  Reverse Forderungsauflösung / Forderungsentstehung
  Update type-of-payment-ftpayitemcase.md
  Correction of a typo
  remove field ActionMoment from de-data-structures
  update BON_START in DSFinV-k generation
  Update for French law
  drop double content
  Added toc.md
  Middleware 1.3.1 release notes
  ...
@christian-rogobete christian-rogobete added waiting-for-review This pull request is finished and is waiting for review. and removed in progress This issue is already in progress to be resolved. labels Jun 16, 2020
@TSchmiedlechner TSchmiedlechner merged commit 6c23357 into fiskaltrust:master Jun 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
waiting-for-review This pull request is finished and is waiting for review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants