Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

295 notable combinations table #298

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 18, 2019
Merged

Conversation

AndrewLister-STFC
Copy link
Contributor

Description of Work

Fixes #295
Adds table of known combinations which may cause erroneous results:
notes

Testing Instructions

  1. Verify that the new table covers known issues

Function: Does the change do what it's supposed to?

Tests: Does it pass? Is there adequate coverage for new code?

Style: Is the coding style consistent? Is anything overly confusing?

Documentation: Is there a suitable change to documentation for this change?

@wathen wathen self-requested a review November 15, 2019 11:28
Copy link
Collaborator

@wathen wathen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add the SasView removes zeros from data at the bottom of docs/source/users/notes.rst?

@tyronerees tyronerees added this to To do in ALC Sprint #3 Nov 15, 2019
@tyronerees tyronerees removed this from To do in ALC Sprint #3 Nov 15, 2019
* before table
* adjustment to sasview note
Copy link
Contributor

@Anders-Markvardsen Anders-Markvardsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@wathen wathen merged commit 8d9f0eb into master Nov 18, 2019
@wathen wathen deleted the 295-Notable_combinations_table branch November 18, 2019 12:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add a table of known problems vs software in the documentation
3 participants