Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/multi xdim fits #160

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2023
Merged

Fix/multi xdim fits #160

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2023

Conversation

fjosw
Copy link
Owner

@fjosw fjosw commented Mar 3, 2023

This PR closes #159 and depends on #158

Co-authored-by: Simon Kuberski <simon.kuberski@uni-muenster.de>
@fjosw fjosw requested a review from s-kuberski March 3, 2023 15:17
Copy link
Collaborator

@s-kuberski s-kuberski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the changes (and the bug fix)! I did not have in mind that we need the uncorrelated chisquared to do the "pre fits" in the case of correlated fits such we cannot eliminate those completely. I still like the new version better than the old one, thanks for adapting it.

@fjosw fjosw merged commit 82cd2f1 into develop Mar 3, 2023
@fjosw fjosw deleted the fix/multi_xdim_fits branch March 3, 2023 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Multi-dimensional fits
2 participants