You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am looking into the possibility of replacing the backend in the case of no backscattering in the circuit components. Instead of calculating inverse of a matrix, the backend will simply need to do a series of matrix multiplication in the forward direction and gives the results at output ports. This can be much faster for complicated circuit where scattering is weak/absent. Is there an easy way to implement this in SAX? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not sure if something like this is easy to add. But feel free to give it a go.
Have you tried the KLU backend? In my experience it's fast enough for any circuit I've tried so far. Not sure if I see a need for it. Although I would probably accept a PR that adds it.
Thank you @flaport! I was using KLU and it takes ~10s seconds for a large MZI network, but it may be hard to optimize or perform sensitivity analysis. I will try to work on a backend to make it faster.
I have submitted a pull request #39 to implement this backend with a dummy example of a cascade MZI network. It provides decent speed-up compared to klu backend especially when the circuit gets complicated @flaport :)
I am looking into the possibility of replacing the backend in the case of no backscattering in the circuit components. Instead of calculating inverse of a matrix, the backend will simply need to do a series of matrix multiplication in the forward direction and gives the results at output ports. This can be much faster for complicated circuit where scattering is weak/absent. Is there an easy way to implement this in SAX? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: