Beta runtime6.4

[zocker-160]

No description provided.

[zocker-160]

Holy shit this protected branches bullshit is so fk annoying.

[flathubbot]

Started test build 15677

[flathubbot]

Build 15677 failed

[dail8859]

Project ERROR: Unknown module(s) in QT: core5compat

Not sure how to configure it to add this extra module but it is needed for Scintilla to compile on Qt6

[flathubbot]

Started test build 15694

[flathubbot]

Build 15694 failed

[flathubbot]

Started test build 15695

[flathubbot]

Build 15695 failed

[zocker-160]

hmmm

[flathubbot]

Started test build 15697

[flathubbot]

Build 15697 failed

[flathubbot]

Started test build 15699

[zocker-160]

welp, will have to wait for https://invent.kde.org/packaging/flatpak-kde-runtime/-/issues/26 then ._.

[flathubbot]

Build 15699 failed

[dail8859]

welp, will have to wait for https://invent.kde.org/packaging/flatpak-kde-runtime/-/issues/26 then ._.

Sounds good. Thanks for giving it a shot at least.

[flathubbot]

Started test build 20318

[flathubbot]

Build 20318 successful
To test this build, install it from the testing repository:

flatpak install --user https://dl.flathub.org/build-repo/2954/com.github.dail8859.NotepadNext.flatpakref

[zocker-160]

@dail8859 it compiled o_O

[zocker-160]

It works fairly well actually. Theming is broken as expected, but it falls back to a default theme which I think is not bad at all.
It also does detect dark mode.

[flathubbot]

Started test build 20320

[flathubbot]

Build 20320 failed

[flathubbot]

Started test build 20322

[flathubbot]

Build 20322 failed

[flathubbot]

Started test build 20324

[flathubbot]

Build 20324 successful
To test this build, install it from the testing repository:

flatpak install --user https://dl.flathub.org/build-repo/2960/com.github.dail8859.NotepadNext.flatpakref

[zocker-160]

There are a few things which are kinda weird but in general it does work, so I am merging into beta.

As for merging to stable, I would not do it if possible, but that is your call.

[dail8859]

it compiled o_O

Nice! I guess it seems the qt5compat library is there already then.

As for merging to stable, I would not do it if possible, but that is your call.

I agree holding off for now is fine. There were some nice fixes that Qt6 provided on Windows and MacOS but nothing I know of currently that Linux would benefit from. Although it is not ideal I'm fine sticking with Qt5 on Linux for now until either there is better support through flatpak or there is a very strong need to upgrade to Qt6.

[zocker-160]

Nice! I guess it seems the qt5compat library is there already then.

Yes it got added into the runtime, but it was delayed as they had compilation issues which seem to have been fixed a week ago or so.

Although it is not ideal I'm fine sticking with Qt5 on Linux for now until either there is better support through flatpak or there is a very strong need to upgrade to Qt6.

Makes sense, but even in the last case, it would work good enough I think, I did not encounter any breaking issues while testing.