Update to 0.1.0

[rmader]

Additional changes:

• Update to Gnome 46 runtime with GTK 4.14, needed for Wayland passtrough.
• Update to Gst 1.24.1 for Wayland passthrough on VA-API and V4L2
  stateless.
• Re-enable Gst VP9 V4L2 stateless decoder, which got improved a lot.
• Add "Downloads" to accessable folders
• Make access to "Videos" and "Downloads" read-only
• Add X11 support because we have to...

[flathubbot]

Started test build 107196

[flathubbot]

Build 107196 failed

[flathubbot]

Started test build 107517

[flathubbot]

Build 107517 failed

[flathubbot]

Started test build 108224

[flathubbot]

Build 108224 failed

[rmader]

Hm, the build now complains about finish-args-only-wayland - so do we have to add the x11-fallback?

[flathubbot]

Started test build 108226

[flathubbot]

Build 108226 successful
To test this build, install it from the testing repository:

flatpak install --user https://dl.flathub.org/build-repo/91046/org.sigxcpu.Livi.flatpakref

[rmader]

Tested both builds - AMD64 and ARM64 - and they seem to work great!

X11 doesn't work of course and that's a app choice. So I really don't understand why we are not allowed to put in the manifest. But well, their call.

So this is ready to merge I think \o/

(unless you want to add https://gitlab.gnome.org/guidog/livi/-/merge_requests/42 ?)

[agx]

@rmader you mentioned brand colors. Do you want to add those as well?

[agx]

Tested both builds - AMD64 and ARM64 - and they seem to work great!

X11 doesn't work of course and that's a app choice. So I really don't understand why we are not allowed to put in the manifest. But well, their call.

So this is ready to merge I think \o/

(unless you want to add https://gitlab.gnome.org/guidog/livi/-/merge_requests/42 ?)

Thanks for looking into this! I think we can go without that MR and do that for 0.1.1.

[rmader]

@rmader you mentioned brand colors. Do you want to add those as well?

I had a chat with Tobias about that and we figured that in order to do it right we should consider (slightly) changing the icon and screenshots etc. as well - and that would require a proper session with some hours time, including feedback rounds with you. So we didn't get to that yet :/

[rmader]

Thanks for looking into this! I think we can go without that MR and do that for 0.1.1.

Agreed - then lets go?

[rmader]

@agx just so you know: on GLES2 devices like the librem5 you'll likely still see occasional glitches with parts of the window being black. That got fixed in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/7053 and will thus disappear once the runtime ships the next GTK dot release.

[agx]

@agx just so you know: on GLES2 devices like the librem5 you'll likely still see occasional glitches with parts of the window being black. That got fixed in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/7053 and will thus disappear once the runtime ships the next GTK dot release.

I think we can live with that until then in favor of giving the whole offload stack more testing. Thanks!

[rmader]

Whoops, I made a typo and changed tag to tage - but shouldn't matter as the commit is still correct. But should be fixed on the next update :P

[hfiguiere]

NEVER use branches. That why the build failed.

[rmader]

Oh I see, thanks! Will open a fix-up MR.

[rmader]

Opened #9