flatlpak list needs to show everything #505
Comments
|
Here's another annoying example OK so --system and --user is implied for 'flatpak list' but for 'flatpak remote-list' only --system is implied. That's inconsistent and super confusing. Please stop making assumptions about what people want filtered. Filtering needs to be explicit, not implicit. |
|
OK and now even more nonsense with remote-ls which assumes --system also. [chris@f25h ~]$ flatpak remote-ls gnome gnome is system installed, it should just know this and list the contents of that remote without requiring me to know I need to use --user to list its contents. This is a maze... |
|
I changed it for list, and i agree that was wrong. However, for the remote options I don't agree, every operation other than run and list work on a specific installation, as they need to know where you're going to modify things. For instance, you could have a "gnome" remote both in the system and the user installation, so remote-ls needs to know which one to list. The one thing we might want to lists both is remote-list i guess, I can see that listing the remote names + whethere they are system or user, and from there you can then do e.g. |
This makes it easier to know all that is available in a single operation. We also show for each remote if it is user or system. See #505
This makes more sense and seems what people expect, as per: flatpak#490 flatpak#505
This makes it easier to know all that is available in a single operation. We also show for each remote if it is user or system. See flatpak#505
Please make 'flatpak list' completely non-filtered. It should show runtimes and apps, for system and users, rather than silently assuming some kind of filtering (i.e. not showing the runtimes). Format the results so I can understand if these are runtimes or apps, and if they're system or user installed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: