Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #798 storageClassName field not taken into account #799

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 19, 2023

Conversation

antrema
Copy link
Collaborator

@antrema antrema commented Jun 19, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #798

Does this PR introduced a user-facing change?

None

Additional documentation, usage docs, etc.:


Signed-off-by: Anthony TREUILLIER <anthony.treuillier@gmail.com>
@benjaminhuo benjaminhuo merged commit bef526d into fluent:master Jun 19, 2023
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: storageClassName field in Fluentd buffer instance not taken into account
2 participants