Add several new methods to Types and Methods Assertions

[fshchudlo]

Hello there.
I've added a couple of methods to types selectors and assertions which, I hope, you find useful.
Corresponding unit tests, of course, added.

Approval tests are definitely broken since I've added new methods, but I'm not sure if I should change them since they are approval tests. I would be grateful if you instruct me on this

IMPORTANT

• The code complies with the Coding Guidelines for C#.
• The changes are covered by a new or existing set of unit tests which follow the Arrange-Act-Assert syntax such as is used in this example.
• If the contribution affects the documentation, please include your changes in this pull request so the documentation will appear on the website.

[fshchudlo]

@jnyrup @dennisdoomen, hi there
I've merged the conflict which I did not see when creating this PR. If I should do anything else to make this PR appropriate, reach out to me with any comments.

[dennisdoomen]

Sorry, completely missed this one. Will take a look tomorrow.

[dennisdoomen]

dennisdoomen approved these changes 12 minutes ago

Sorry, I meant to click the "Request Changes" button.

Approval tests are definitely broken since I've added new methods, but I'm not sure if I should change them since they are approval tests. I would be grateful if you instruct me on this

You can run AcceptApiChanges.ps1 to accept the changes and update the contract files.

Oh, and would you also be willing to update the docs and release notes under docs\pages?

[fshchudlo]

Sure. it's a pleasure for me to make a contribution to such a nice library :)
I'll do everything needed ASAP.

[fshchudlo]

Oh, and would you also be willing to update the docs and release notes under docs\pages?

I've described new ReturnTypes, UnwrapTaskTypes and UnwrapEnumerableTypes. Everything else is small changes that fit the description at the end of the docs: "There are so many possibilities and specialized methods that none of these examples do them good. Check out the TypeAssertionSpecs.cs".

Can you also instruct me about release notes? Should it be described as 5.11.0 or 6.1.0 version?

I need more time to add tests for TypeEnumerableExtensions. I hope I'll be able to add them tomorrow.

And the last one, I would be grateful if you instruct me about the need to rebase all these changes to a single commit since there are a lot of them now.

[dennisdoomen]

I've described new ReturnTypes, UnwrapTaskTypes and UnwrapEnumerableTypes. Everything else is small changes that fit the description at the end of the docs

Looks good to me.

Can you also instruct me about release notes? Should it be described as 5.11.0 or 6.1.0 version?

It's all going to be part of 6.0.0. Just add it under the "new" section.

And the last one, I would be grateful if you instruct me about the need to rebase all these changes to a single commit since there are a lot of them now.

If you have not "designed" your PR as clean separated commits, will just squash-merge your changes. I myself follow a pretty rigorous practice to get a clean source control history.

[fshchudlo]

Well, as far as I can see, everything is done :)

But the build is broken for some reason not related to my changes, as I can see. Could you please look what’s the matter for it?

[jnyrup]

Love the feeling every time I get to digest a PR, to become more comfortable with it, and we together file of the rough edges to get a polished result ❤️

[jnyrup]

@fshchudlo Thanks for the contribution!

[fshchudlo]

@jnyrup I'm sure this is my first contribution, but not the last :) Thank you for such a thorough study of PR and such a cool library :)