-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 946
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update resource/privileged of juicefs #2130
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2130 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 52.72% 52.69% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 298 298
Lines 21726 21712 -14
==========================================
- Hits 11454 11442 -12
+ Misses 9048 9043 -5
- Partials 1224 1227 +3
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
pkg/ddc/juicefs/type.go
Outdated
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ type Configs struct { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
type Worker struct { | |||
NotPrivileged bool `yaml:"notPrivileged,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This supposed to be unPrivileged
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about using privileged
? unPrivileged is not straight forward.
@zwwhdls Please fix DCO for the newest commit. The code lgtm. |
Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me>
Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me>
61afeba
to
4a7c949
Compare
@@ -124,8 +124,10 @@ spec: | |||
- containerPort: 9567 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please update 1. chart version 2. change log , so we can keep them on track.
Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
* update resource/privileged of juicefs Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> * fix resource Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> * update changelog of chart & update privileged Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me>
* update resource/privileged of juicefs Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> * fix resource Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> * update changelog of chart & update privileged Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> Signed-off-by: cheyang <cheyang@163.com>
* update resource/privileged of juicefs Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> * fix resource Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> * update changelog of chart & update privileged Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> Signed-off-by: cheyang <cheyang@163.com> Signed-off-by: zwwhdls <zww@hdls.me> Signed-off-by: cheyang <cheyang@163.com> Co-authored-by: Weiwei <zww@hdls.me>
Signed-off-by: zwwhdls zww@hdls.me
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
make privileged and resource of juicefs worker setable
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews