New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CP] Update vm_snapshot_analysis to 0.7.6 #133658
Comments
Note that this isn't a direct cherry-pick of 3b8f6c4, but only updates the pinned |
@sstrickl is there any reason why we wouldn’t pick the entire change? Have we tested this cherry-pick with the full DEPS roll? Reaching out to @christopherfujino for initial review. |
The only reason I didn't just cherry pick 3b8f6c4 was just trying to limit the amount of package changes hitting stable, when only the one for |
Thanks for explaining @sstrickl! We already cut for the next release, so we have time to work though the pros and cons of each approach 🙂. |
@sstrickl I think you did the right thing. Also, I love your avatar. @itsjustkevin I'll add an action item for our next 1:1 to discuss codifying exactly how to handle these situations. |
@itsjustkevin I think this slipped through the cracks and was missed for the 3.13.3 stable release. |
@christopherfujino and @sstrickl this did slip through and that is 100% on me. So we are aligned on submitting the cherry-pick as is? |
Yep, sounds like it :) |
Yes, looks good to go |
Closing this once it is released. |
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. If you are still experiencing a similar issue, please open a new bug, including the output of |
Issue Link
#132695
Commit Hash
3b8f6c4
Target
stable
PR Link
#133657
Changelog Description
Build fails when using the
--analyze-size
argument.Impacted Users
All Flutter developers
Impact Description
When using the
--analyze-size
argument, builds fail with a crash inpackage:vm_snapshot_analysis/v8_profile.dart
.Workaround
Manually updating the flutter package dependencies or using the beta branch.
Risk
low
Test Coverage
yes
Validation Steps
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: