Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add event metadata field to HelmRelease spec #682

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

matheuscscp
Copy link
Contributor

@matheuscscp matheuscscp commented May 1, 2023

Fixes #680

@matheuscscp matheuscscp changed the title Spec metadata Add event metadata field to HelmRelease spec May 1, 2023
@hiddeco
Copy link
Member

hiddeco commented May 1, 2023

This has overlap with #514, and is in general quite the change to accept without more discussion among maintainers.

I suggest you join one of our project meetings to further discuss your proposal.

@matheuscscp
Copy link
Contributor Author

matheuscscp commented May 1, 2023

Nice, thanks for pointing that out! I didn't know about the meetings, I joined the list and subscribed to the calendar here!! Thanks 🙏 🙏 🙏

Signed-off-by: Matheus Pimenta <matheuscscp@gmail.com>
@stefanprodan
Copy link
Member

Closing this in favour of fluxcd/notification-controller#519

@matheuscscp matheuscscp deleted the spec-metadata branch May 12, 2023 08:52
@ihor-hrytskiv ihor-hrytskiv mentioned this pull request Aug 18, 2023
@moritzschmitz-oviva
Copy link

Can we re-open this one? Yes, there is an overlap with #514, but this one here tackles a different issue.

My use-case:
I have an app which creates deployments via the GitHub API. Then in the same step, it writes a HelmRelease manifest to a repository which is reconciled via FluxCD. After the reconciliation, I want to use the notification-controller to call my app again, which then calls the deployments API again to show the deployment as done.

To be able to match the created HelmRelease with the deployment though, I would want to add some identifying data to the HelmRelease manifest and then return this as metadata via the notification-controller.

@moritzschmitz-oviva
Copy link

@matheuscscp Any chance you joined a meeting and brought this up already?

@moritzschmitz-oviva
Copy link

@matheuscscp And more on-topic, would it be enough to just include the manifest's .metadata.labels and/or .metadata.annotations?

@matheuscscp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@matheuscscp Any chance you joined a meeting and brought this up already?

I can do it this week 👌

@matheuscscp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @moritzschmitz-oviva, while this feature is not available in the HelmRelease API, would you let me know if the equivalent on the Alert API suffices for your use case? See this: https://fluxcd.io/flux/components/notification/alerts/#event-metadata

@moritzschmitz-oviva
Copy link

Hey @moritzschmitz-oviva, while this feature is not available in the HelmRelease API, would you let me know if the equivalent on the Alert API suffices for your use case? See this: https://fluxcd.io/flux/components/notification/alerts/#event-metadata

Hm, just had another look and it would suffice if I change my setup a bit.

My folder structure right now:

  • alert.yaml
  • namespace/application/release.yaml

I could change to:

  • namespace/application/alert.yaml
  • namespace/application/release.yaml

What I am trying to say: I could add an Alert on a per-deployment basis and then add the deployment-specific metadata to the Alert directly. Not my ideal way, because I multiply resources, but works as workaround.

@matheuscscp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@moritzschmitz-oviva One question: how would you identify the GitHub deployment?

@moritzschmitz-oviva
Copy link

@moritzschmitz-oviva One question: how would you identify the GitHub deployment?

The API returns an ID when creating a deployment: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/deployments/deployments?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-a-deployment.

We have a GitHub app which creates a deployment via above API and then modifies files inside the FluxCD repository. When we create the files, we already have the ID and can set it as a metadata field. Now when the notification-controller reports the successful installation of the HelmRelease we call the GitHub app again and pass the metadata. It then knows which deployment to 'proceed'. Does that make sense?

@matheuscscp
Copy link
Contributor Author

matheuscscp commented May 22, 2024

Hey @moritzschmitz-oviva I just wanted to let you know that we are going to support sending object annotation keys prefixed with a to-be-defined API Group, e.g. something like events.toolkit.fluxcd.io/myCustomMetadataKey or notification.toolkit.fluxcd.io/myCustomMetadataKey. This will be supported across all Flux controllers in a uniform way, not just for HelmRelease. I will open an RFC in the flux2 repo for this.

@moritzschmitz-oviva
Copy link

@matheuscscp This is seriously great news! Thanks for picking this up! 🚀

@matheuscscp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature request: Add field to HelmRelease CRD for adding metadata to events
4 participants