-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 265
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Enestad <fredrik@enestad.com>
These look like appropriate changes for maintenance mode, I don't know if this change can be merged by itself or when we can plan on making another release of Helm Operator. I'm looking at #599 and I think that a release will be necessary soon. I don't think there's any reason we wouldn't release this change, of course I'm speaking about it before having tested the change in any way. I'd like to avoid making several releases back to back if we can get the job done with a single one. But if this is urgent for you, and #599 is waiting for 1.22 which will not be ready for maybe a few months yet, maybe it makes sense to do separate releases and get this one out sooner. Please bear with us while I try to find the way forward, it will help if you can give us an idea of how much testing you've already done on this change. Thanks again for making this contribution! |
Hey @kingdonb If I know that you will eventually release it, I'm happy, and we can roll with a custom build version of this PR until then. In terms of testing, I have deployed this PR to our lab-cluster, and can there see that we don't encounter that specific error anymore, and so far it have not caused any other havoc. We use helm v3 only, so the helm v2 path has not been tested more than via the test command. Let me know if there is anything specific that you want me to test. Otherwise I'll monitor it for a few days and then start rolling it out to our staging clusters. |
This is an awesome pull request, many thanks! While all tests pass and the code looks OK, I am wondering what changed (in Do you by any chance have any knowledge of this, so that we can keep a reference? |
🙏
I did have to add a context to these calls in this PR, and I had to upgrade helm-2to3 to a later version as they also had calls without context in the version that were previously imported here. But other than that I didn't have to do anything. Maybe something was done upstream? If you have a branch or so where you encountered the problem, I can have a look to see if I can understand what is different. |
We've been running this (helm v3) in production for a couple of days now without any problems. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @fredr 🌻
We encountered a bug that was introduced in helm 3.1.2, that when updating a hpa in
autoscaling/v2beta2
with the newbehavior
field, we got this error message:I know helm-operator is in maintenance mode, but I hope this can be accepted since there is no way around this issue. There is probably lots of other bugs fixed in helm that could be good to get in to helm-operator.