Flux Website Resource Page Update

[thisisobate]

Fixes cncf/techdocs#192
Todos

• Create UI for filter
• Create search index for filter
• Create logic for filter
• Make mobile responsive
• Test if everything works as expected
• Clean code
• Modify thumbnail logic to support article urls

[kingdonb]

Thank you for getting started on this! I have taken a screenshot of the progress as I found it so far, then it will be easier for reviewers. 🚀

[thisisobate]

@kingdonb Please feel free to review

[thisisobate]

@juozasg

[kingdonb]

Thanks! I have this on my radar, I see you're ready! We've got the KubeCon Paris CFP deadline coming up in two days, and then we'll be more available for PR reviews. It looks like you have completed the work based on the checklist ✅

Assigning myself so this gets kept track of!

[kingdonb]

Adding some review comments with screenshots to highlight the work I see that is new, please feel free to add comments that detail any parts I should review or might have missed!

The "video" tags are new - the date in the corner is nice, but sometimes overlaps the text!

The Article type entry is new. We have added a link to the Weaveworks blog where an article has been published 🎉 this is what we wanted, perfect. The advance or development here is that we can republish articles from an alternative source, which is exactly what we asked for in SD-1944. Bravo, thank you

The UI chrome can sometimes float above the header bar! That's less than ideal, but I don't know if that's something you can try to fix before we merge this? I think this is ready for review anyway. Look here in the upper left:

You can filter by content type, to show only articles. The one article we publish first being a link to the Weaveworks website is probably fine. That's neither here nor there

This looks good! Can we have some feedback from maintainers, once these issues are addressed does this look like something we can merge, (or do we need to add more external articles first?)

[thisisobate]

@kingdonb I have fixed all the issues you mentioned above.
Please kindly take a look.
Thanks!

[thisisobate]

do we need to add more external articles first?

I think this can be done by the community as a follow-up PR.

cc: @kingdonb

[kingdonb]

We've just had another chance to review this, it looks like all the corrections you made are good! I'm happy to approve this.

(Will be rebasing before merge)

[xunholy]

LGTM - Only tiny thing I'd mention is handling EOL at EOF which can be easily fixed in your IDE settings.

[kingdonb]

I'm going to reopen this, I cannot merge it by myself and I cannot edit your branch, but I've rebased the commits and merged it with #1748 that created the conflict

[kingdonb]

Reopened as #1749

(Will be likely merged as soon as I have an approving review from another maintainer with write access!)