-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use docker socket proxy instead of mounting /var/run/docker.sock #317
Comments
been wanting this for a while |
I have been using WUD with docker-socket-proxy and it works pretty well. |
What is your compose like?
…On Fri, Mar 15, 2024, 7:45 PM Ameer Dawood ***@***.***> wrote:
I have been using WUD with docker-socket-proxy and it works pretty well.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#317 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACGD6KTE5WTSWJ2P5G6MI7DYYLNL3AVCNFSM6AAAAAA4RML3KKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSOJZGQ4DKMJSGI>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Here is my compose file.
|
I've been using the socket proxy for a remote server and it has been working well. My local watcher uses the direct socket mount, but it should work the same doing it local vs remote. There is some configuring to the proxy container as well, which I pulled an issue here for, and @fmartinou helped out with (#354). My compose entries are below. Hope this helps. Host Machine:
Remote machine
|
thanks for sharing this. i'm confused though, why isn't your WUD using the socket proxy port? |
@kingp0dd It's been a bit since I set it up, but I think because 2375 is the default port for the docker socket to be exposed (whether using the proxy or not). If exposing the socket proxy on a different port, you would have to specify in the WUD config. |
that makes much more sense now. thanks mate! edit: |
Hi @kingp0dd, are you still having the problem? In my cases is working without any problem. |
Was there a recent update or change to support it? I haven't tried it yet
…On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, 10:47 AM cerealconyogurt ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @kingp0dd <https://github.com/kingp0dd>, are you still having the
problem? In my cases is working without any problem.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#317 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACGD6KUMPUPNDZGYXDUOZGDZJDK5VAVCNFSM6AAAAAA4RML3KKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOBXHA2TAMJZGI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I am not sure since this is the first time for me installing this app.
|
Can we add support to use docker-socket-proxy container instead of using mount to /var/run/docker.sock for security purposes?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: