You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello there, first of all, thank you for this wonderful library.
I've been using it instead of regular javafx for the fast few while and I really enjoy using it. However I have encountered a few roadblocks.
What would be the correct way to emulate the infamous "fit-to-parent" AnchorPane functionality? My so far unsuccessful approach was something like this:
But for some controls (ImageView cough) I know, this just won't cut it in the long run. So are there major hurdles for the nested-properties branch to get merged? I looked at the source and am looking forward to the :bind/property syntax with [:id :prop] values. I don't really get the complete picture of what is depending on what right now, but with some pointers I would like to look into this and help if possible/necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The bind implementation is slightly hacky, and could be improved, but the real reason is that wanted to look whether a different API would be better. I'm not very happy with the dot notation, but otherwise have no better idea :) . A treeview for example looks like this:
Support Question
Hello there, first of all, thank you for this wonderful library.
I've been using it instead of regular javafx for the fast few while and I really enjoy using it. However I have encountered a few roadblocks.
What would be the correct way to emulate the infamous "fit-to-parent" AnchorPane functionality? My so far unsuccessful approach was something like this:
But for some controls (ImageView cough) I know, this just won't cut it in the long run. So are there major hurdles for the nested-properties branch to get merged? I looked at the source and am looking forward to the :bind/property syntax with [:id :prop] values. I don't really get the complete picture of what is depending on what right now, but with some pointers I would like to look into this and help if possible/necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: