Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

D.3.3.7 User Identity Negotiation Support #1110

Closed
samnaction opened this issue Sep 24, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1546
Closed

D.3.3.7 User Identity Negotiation Support #1110

samnaction opened this issue Sep 24, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1546
Labels
enhancement version5 to be implemented in version 5

Comments

@samnaction
Copy link

D.3.3.7 of dicom standard talks about the User Identity Negotiation. This is an optional mechanism to send/receive user credentials, a Kerberos ticket or a SAML assertion during DICOM association negotiation. This is a useful feature which provides association negotiation to perform authorization controls.

@samnaction samnaction added the new label Sep 24, 2020
@gofal gofal added enhancement and removed new labels Sep 24, 2020
@gofal
Copy link
Contributor

gofal commented Sep 24, 2020

http://dicom.nema.org/Medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part07/sect_D.3.3.7.html

@gofal gofal added netstandard version5 to be implemented in version 5 and removed netstandard labels Oct 18, 2020
@SyarifFakhri
Copy link

Is this still in the works? This would be a great feature to have :)

PantelisGeorgiadis added a commit to PantelisGeorgiadis/fo-dicom that referenced this issue Apr 22, 2023
PantelisGeorgiadis added a commit to PantelisGeorgiadis/fo-dicom that referenced this issue Apr 30, 2023
PantelisGeorgiadis added a commit to PantelisGeorgiadis/fo-dicom that referenced this issue May 1, 2023
PantelisGeorgiadis added a commit to PantelisGeorgiadis/fo-dicom that referenced this issue May 15, 2023
mrbean-bremen pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 15, 2023
* fixes #1110
* Updated tests to use Microsoft.Extensions.Logging
* Updated README
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement version5 to be implemented in version 5
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants