Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

how to support additional aws regions, e.g. cn-north-1 #164

Closed
dwu-pivotal opened this issue Aug 6, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

how to support additional aws regions, e.g. cn-north-1 #164

dwu-pivotal opened this issue Aug 6, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@dwu-pivotal
Copy link

how to support additional aws regions, e.g. cn-north-1, thx

@geemus
Copy link
Member

geemus commented Aug 11, 2015

Usually it is pretty straightforward, we just add it to the list of expected values for initialization. But if I remember correctly there are some particulars around cn-north-1 that make this more complicated.

@lanej @fcheung do either of you remember the specifics around the cn regions that made them more difficult and/or am I misremembering?

@lanej
Copy link
Member

lanej commented Aug 11, 2015

@geemus @fcheung if i remember correctly, not everyone has access to it. So it's possible to give users a false expectation of success.

Validation of region is also disparate across all services. Might be worth cleaning that up too. Maybe create some mechanism for enabling other regions that only certain users have access to ?

@fcheung
Copy link
Contributor

fcheung commented Aug 11, 2015

For china, as for other regions, signature v4 is required, at the time that code didn't exist so it would have been a big effort (that in the end got done with the frankfurt region)

The china one is a bit special - you have to have a separate account (apparently it's still in limited preview) so there may be no-one in a position to test it. To be honest I'd be fine with fog just validating that it's a valid region at all, and if you try and use a region that you don't have access to you'll find out soon enough.

@geemus
Copy link
Member

geemus commented Aug 12, 2015

I'd also lean toward just letting people specify (and get an error), seems simplest and probably good-enough. If somebody would like to add it to the list of acceptable regions in a PR I think we will probably be good to go.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been marked inactive and will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@geemus
Copy link
Member

geemus commented Mar 22, 2021

Appears to have been closed by #169

@geemus geemus closed this as completed Mar 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants