Prefix output for --no-pretty with the package name

[folke]

Right now, --no-pretty while mix output from all running commands and prefix them with the command.

It would be better to also add the package name to the prefix to make it easier to debug what output is coming from what command.

(see also #89)

[folke]

Fixed in v3.4.1 🚀

[tshelburne]

Hi @folke, thanks for your quick attention on this - I am seeing where output is prefixed, but it looks like it is prefixed with the root command rather than the package name.

For example, my start script in @apps/client might be cross-env ENVVAR=whatever parcel index.html, in @apps/compute be run-p start:*, and in @apps/api run-p start:*. The output generally looks like this:

[run-p]
[run-p] 1:11:01 PM - Found 0 errors. Watching for file changes.
[run-p] [nodemon] restarting due to changes...
[run-p] [nodemon] restarting due to changes...
[run-p] [nodemon] restarting due to changes...
[run-p] [nodemon] starting `node build/server.js`
[run-p] Server running at http://localhost:3001
[cross-env] ✨  Built in 24.91s.
[run-p]
[run-p] 1:11:04 PM - Found 0 errors. Watching for file changes.
[run-p] [nodemon] restarting due to changes...
[run-p] [nodemon] starting `node build/server.js`
[run-p] Server running at http://localhost:3000

I would instead expect the relevant prefixes to be [@apps/api], [@apps/compute] and [@apps/client]. On top of having to know what commands runs each app, when the commands are the same, it's impossible to distinguish.

[folke]

That's really odd.

Are you sure you're running the latest version of ultra? Should be 3.4.1 or higher.

Example output in one of my repos:

$ ultra -r --no-pretty --filter "apps/*" "echo test"

❯ @splora/api at apps/api (@splora/api)
❯ @splora/app at apps/app (@splora/app)
$ echo test (@splora/api)
$ echo test (@splora/app)
[@splora/api::echo] test
[@splora/app::echo] test

The first two lines are titles, then twice a command that will be executed, followed by the ouput.

Packages in this example are @splora/api and @splora/app

[folke]

Package names are only added when running with -r, so when running in a single package. Maybe that's the issue?

[tshelburne]

You are correct, version problem. I updated the package.json in a different branch.

Thanks!

[folke]

Great, glad you figured it out!