New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[varLib / instancer] leaves DSIG in static instance; should remove #1480
Comments
Probably same about varLib building VF? |
Good point. I haven't tried that, but I don't see anything for DSIG in varLIb/init.py for it, so... |
Fixed mutator. Reopening to check varLib. |
behdad
changed the title
[varLib.mutator] leaves DSIG in static instance; should remove
[varLib / instancer] leaves DSIG in static instance; should remove
Oct 28, 2022
behdad
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2022
behdad
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Looks like varLib.mutator does not strip DSIG when generating static instances, thus the instance has the VF's DSIG. If that DSIG was not a dummy DSIG, then the DSIG will be invalid for the static instance. Probably would be good to just strip DSIG or replace it with a dummy.
This is a minor issue since practically nothing validates DSIGs, but anyway...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: