Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: data migration and cleanup for userId attribute #2400

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

pandeymangg
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Removes the old userId attribute code, and has a data migration which transforms the userId attributes to the userId column in the Person table

Fixes # (issue)

How should this be tested?

  • Test A
  • Test B

Checklist

Required

  • Filled out the "How to test" section in this PR
  • Read How we Code at Formbricks
  • Self-reviewed my own code
  • Commented on my code in hard-to-understand bits
  • Ran pnpm build
  • Checked for warnings, there are none
  • Removed all console.logs
  • Merged the latest changes from main onto my branch with git pull origin main
  • My changes don't cause any responsiveness issues

Appreciated

  • If a UI change was made: Added a screen recording or screenshots to this PR
  • Updated the Formbricks Docs if changes were necessary

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 5, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
formbricks-cloud ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 15, 2024 0:43am
formbricks-com ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 15, 2024 0:43am

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

@pandeymangg pandeymangg marked this pull request as ready for review April 8, 2024 04:34
Copy link
Contributor

@Dhruwang Dhruwang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @pandeymangg , tested the migration script in different scenarios, works well 🚀✅, other changes looks good too 🙌🏻

Can we just remove truncateMiddle function, since it is not being used any where now !

@Dhruwang Dhruwang requested a review from mattinannt April 9, 2024 12:28
@Dhruwang Dhruwang self-requested a review April 10, 2024 13:09
Copy link
Contributor

@Dhruwang Dhruwang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 😊🚀

Copy link
Member

@mattinannt mattinannt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pandeymangg thanks; looks good :-)
Only two smaller things. If they are fixed let's do the data migration on cloud together :-)

name: "userId",
},
});
});
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we need to add a timeout, at least:

{
  timeout: 60000,
}

maybe even more, else it will fail on large databases with many people (like formbricks cloud).

@@ -41,6 +41,11 @@ const setEmail = async (email: string): Promise<void> => {
};

const setAttribute = async (key: string, value: any): Promise<void> => {
if (key === "userId") {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did we decide to do this?
I think we can allow since we cleaned up everything now :-) It wouldn't have the affect the user might want to have and he will get a new attribute class named userId, but if they want this we maybe shouldn't stop them from it in the future.

@mattinannt mattinannt added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 5add263 Apr 15, 2024
12 checks passed
@mattinannt mattinannt deleted the fix/userId-migration branch April 15, 2024 13:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants