-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docker Image With fpm #87
Comments
Yes. Even better we should distribute fpm as a single binary for each platform. |
I think we should focus more on package manager distributions than just an executable. At a minimum we should support |
Yes, we need all of those also.
…On Sun, May 31, 2020, at 8:11 PM, Brad Richardson wrote:
I think we should focus more on package manager distributions than just
an executable. At a minimum we should support `apt`, `yum`, `pacman`,
and `homebrew`. Probably also some others. Manually installed things
don't get updated very often, if at all.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#87 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAFAWAXGOLNFFNM2HC23I3RUME43ANCNFSM4NO5JRWQ>.
|
Let's not forget I'm not a target audience for Docker image but I see its value. Linux system package managers like apt and dnf I use occasionally, but I can't take them seriously because so many packages are out of date, so they're mostly good for mature (stable) packages. I agree one should be able to get fpm using those. Then also consider Homebrew, Linuxbrew, and Snapcraft. |
I quickly slapped together a docker image here. I scheduled the CI to update weekly as well. At some point this will deserve some effort to trim down the size of the resulting image. Right now I based it on Ubuntu and built fpm in the image. It should be possible to use a more lightweight starting point (like Alpine) and just copy in the fpm executable. Then we should create a more official one and publish it on docker hub. |
Great! I think it's a good start. I suggest adding the Dockerfile (and associated instructions in the README.md) to the fpm repo. |
Now that fpm is in a usable state, I think we should try and create a docker image with the latest version installed, so people can use fpm in their CI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: