You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Payroll Entry doctype is at present very unintuitive. It generates Pay Slips, and it generates Journal Entries, but it doesn't maintain any reference to those things after it has been submitted. A user could go cancel each of the pay slips or amend the journal entry, but the payroll entry doc would never know. If the payroll entry is cancelled, nothing happens to the journal entry or pay slips.
At minimum, the Payroll Entry doctype should maintain reference to the Pay Slips it represents, and also to the Journal Entry it creates.
Even better, it should write directly to the General Ledger rather than requiring a separate Journal Entry, as the name -- Payroll Entry -- seems to imply it should.
My organization would be happy to initiate some work on this, but I am reluctant to make changes like this without some public discussion first. I made a few posts on the forum (see here and here), but they didn't attract much attention.
Thoughts? This has been a significant snag as we've tried to roll out ERPNext at several of our subsidiaries, but we'd like to make sure any changes we make are accepted by the general community rather than just a fork.
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The
Payroll Entry
doctype is at present very unintuitive. It generatesPay Slips
, and it generatesJournal Entries
, but it doesn't maintain any reference to those things after it has been submitted. A user could go cancel each of the pay slips or amend the journal entry, but the payroll entry doc would never know. If the payroll entry is cancelled, nothing happens to the journal entry or pay slips.At minimum, the
Payroll Entry
doctype should maintain reference to thePay Slips
it represents, and also to theJournal Entry
it creates.Even better, it should write directly to the General Ledger rather than requiring a separate Journal Entry, as the name -- Payroll Entry -- seems to imply it should.
My organization would be happy to initiate some work on this, but I am reluctant to make changes like this without some public discussion first. I made a few posts on the forum (see here and here), but they didn't attract much attention.
Thoughts? This has been a significant snag as we've tried to roll out ERPNext at several of our subsidiaries, but we'd like to make sure any changes we make are accepted by the general community rather than just a fork.
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: