Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 29, 2022. It is now read-only.

Unable to see the reference link doctype #90

Closed
nanoharsha opened this issue Sep 20, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Unable to see the reference link doctype #90

nanoharsha opened this issue Sep 20, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nanoharsha
Copy link

We are unable to see the refence doctype. For eg when we assign an issue, a todo is created with a reference to the issue doctype and link to it also.
In web system we can check the reference issue from the todo, but as of now the system doesn't show the reference issue in the reference_name field. A snapshot is as belowimage

@sumitbhanushali sumitbhanushali added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 28, 2021
sumitbhanushali added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2021
sumitbhanushali added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2021
* feat: use filters from user settings #91

* fix: timeformat exception

* fix: null check

* feat: add reference link in linkfield #90

* feat: add dynamic link #90 #80

* fix: empty list in child table, shortcut filters for basefields,

* feat: date format according to system settings #99

* feat: bigger session expiry for device mobile

* fix: ios downloader fix

* fix: parsedate empty string handling
sumitbhanushali added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 21, 2021
* feat: use filters from user settings #91

* fix: timeformat exception

* fix: null check

* feat: add reference link in linkfield #90

* feat: add dynamic link #90 #80

* fix: empty list in child table, shortcut filters for basefields,

* feat: date format according to system settings #99

* feat: bigger session expiry for device mobile

* fix: ios downloader fix

* fix: parsedate empty string handling
@sumitbhanushali
Copy link
Contributor

deployed on v1.1

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants