Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up dev scripting output #134

Closed
4 tasks done
conorsch opened this issue Aug 30, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed
4 tasks done

Clean up dev scripting output #134

conorsch opened this issue Aug 30, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@conorsch
Copy link
Contributor

conorsch commented Aug 30, 2018

The current Makefile-based provisioning workflow for development has a lot of output; the majority of info printed to stdout during a normal dev sessions is not actionable. A few suggested targets for cleanup:

  • silence make clone tar command
  • silence make prep-salt target
  • quieter VM destroy (currently lots of stderr output on a normal make clean, even if VMs don't exist)
  • The make clone command should also support environment variables, to support development machines that are not named work, as discussed in Enable apparmor for whonix gateway and workstation vms #124.

Most of the changes in the brief wish list above I already store in patches locally, and I understand at least @joshuathayer does the same for the devvm name override. Let's get those patches in the repo to make iterating on the workstation more pleasant.

conorsch pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2018
Partial progress toward #134. Doesn't resolve, but at least gets the
tests passing on sd-journalist again. Still struggling to get all tests
passing against sd-whonix.
conorsch pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2018
Partial progress toward #134. Doesn't resolve, but at least gets the
tests passing on sd-journalist again. Still struggling to get all tests
passing against sd-whonix.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant