New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Statistics refactory #120
Statistics refactory #120
Conversation
…, ordered by amount of money offered.
Thanks HB! |
Stats shows raw history numbers. We don't need to filter expired offers.
Thanks and congratulations for creating django-aggregate-if :-) I still can't get it to work on my machine though. When I try to open
|
Which Postgres version are you using? As I remember, all the tests passed I will test it again. |
@henriquebastos You don't have tests with bool fields. =) I send a PR in django-aggregate-if project to solve this postgres issue. I'm using PostgreSQL 9.2. |
Cool! I'll merge it asap Henrique Bastos http://henriquebastos.net Curso Welcome to the Django http://welcometothedjango.com.br Twitter: @henriquebastos http://twitter.com/henriquebastos On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Iuri de Silvio notifications@github.comwrote:
|
This problem happened due to a bug in django-aggregate-if 0.2. Thanks to @iurisilvio it's fixed! \o/ I've already uploaded version 0.3 to pypi and updated FS requirements.txt. @tonylampada please try it again. |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
It is probably a bit outdated, but long time ago I tested this pull request and it worked fine. At least it has a lot of tests, so it is a big improvement to stats module. |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
2 similar comments
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
This PR: