Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add mock to improve backtesting tests #194

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 16, 2017

Conversation

glonlas
Copy link
Member

@glonlas glonlas commented Dec 16, 2017

To improve backtesting tests and speed up them, mock have been added instead of downloading ticker_history from bittrex.

It answers the comment from @gcarq from this PR: #174

Copy link
Member

@gcarq gcarq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works as expected, thanks :-)

@gcarq gcarq merged commit 1486861 into freqtrade:develop Dec 16, 2017
jpipas added a commit to jpipas/freqtrade that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2017
* upstream/develop: (22 commits)
  create config.json for backtesting
  create config.json for hyperopt
  install freqtrade module for hyperopting
  run pytest, hyperopt and backtesting in parallel
  fix plotting broken by refactoring
  fix hyperopt not getting default ticker_interval
  add smoke test commands under script block
  add smoke tests to run a round of hyperopt and backtesting
  Add mock to improve backtesting tests (freqtrade#194)
  Allow user to update testdata files with parameter --refresh-pairs-cached (freqtrade#174)
  invoke flake8 after success
  adapt README
  fix pep8 warnings
  add setup.cfg to configure flake8
  update README
  add service file
  ignore cancelled order during trade state update
  move function
  fix NoneType issue
  /forcesell: handle trades with open orders
  ...
@glonlas glonlas deleted the add_mock_for_backtesting_tests branch December 25, 2017 03:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants