Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] mainnet wasm has wrong version #882

Closed
p5150j opened this issue Jan 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #884
Closed

[Bug] mainnet wasm has wrong version #882

p5150j opened this issue Jan 6, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #884
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@p5150j
Copy link
Collaborator

p5150j commented Jan 6, 2023

Frequency: Frequency release mainnet wasm has wrong version "frequency-rococo" that should be "frequency"

@p5150j p5150j added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 6, 2023
@wilwade wilwade closed this as completed in 6053ae1 Jan 9, 2023
abadaa pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2023
# Goal
The goal of this PR is to make sure that the correct feature flags are
being used with srtool for wasm generation

Closes #882 

# Discussion
- srtool default-features flag does not work as intended
- Instead using build-opts
- Enabled debug logging in srtool for easier checking
- Added subwasm check to test the output wasm

Test Runs:
- Mainnet:
https://github.com/LibertyDSNP/frequency/actions/runs/3859784794/jobs/6579633360
<img width="1010" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1252199/211126355-d6f917d3-0ef2-447c-8f81-ac5333ce34d1.png">

- Rococo:
https://github.com/LibertyDSNP/frequency/actions/runs/3859784794/jobs/6579633325
<img width="892" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1252199/211126378-037467be-b34d-4e6c-bafb-effdafb46328.png">


# Checklist
- [x] Tests added
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants