Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 3, 2023. It is now read-only.

Printf test failures on Mono/Linux for F# 3.1 #184

Closed
ghost opened this issue Nov 29, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

Printf test failures on Mono/Linux for F# 3.1 #184

ghost opened this issue Nov 29, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 29, 2013

I've been working on activating testing using tests/fsharp/core/... on non-Windows platforms

vagrant@vagrant-debian-wheezy:/vagrant/tests/fsharp/core$ mono --version
Mono JIT compiler version 3.0.10 ((no/eff4cb5 Fri Jun 7 06:45:28 EDT 2013)
Copyright (C) 2002-2012 Novell, Inc, Xamarin Inc and Contributors. www.mono-proj
ect.com
TLS: __thread
SIGSEGV: altstack
Notifications: epoll
Architecture: amd64
Disabled: none
Misc: softdebug
LLVM: supported, not enabled.
GC: Included Boehm (with typed GC and Parallel Mark)

vagrant@vagrant-debian-wheezy:/vagrant/tests/fsharp/core$ uname -a

Linux vagrant-debian-wheezy 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.41-2+deb7u2 x86_64 GNU/Linux


FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7042: expected
' 000005' but produced
'00000 5'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7073: expected
'-0010' but produced
'00-10'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7129: expected
'-0010' but produced
'00-10'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7161: expected
'5 ' but produced
'5000000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7210: expected
' 000005' but produced
'00000 5'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7238: expected
'-000010' but produced
'0000-10'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7266: expected
'-000010' but produced
'0000-10'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7299: expected
'-10 ' but produced
'-1000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7329: expected
'5 ' but produced
'5000000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7383: expected
' 5 ' but produced
' 5000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7437: expected
'-0010' but produced
'00-10'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7528: expected
'+5 ' but produced
'+5000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7551: expected
' 5 ' but produced
' 5000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7630: expected
'-000010' but produced
'0000-10'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7633: expected
'-0010' but produced
'00-10'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7768: expected
'-0010' but produced
'00-10'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7770: expected
'-000010' but produced
'0000-10'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7833: expected
'5 ' but produced
'5000000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7864: expected
'+5 ' but produced
'+5000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7882: expected
' 000005' but produced
'00000 5'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7892: expected
' 5 ' but produced
' 5000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7915: expected
'-10 ' but produced
'-1000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test7948: expected
'-10 ' but produced
'-1000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test8004: expected
'10 ' but produced
'10000'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test8190: expected
'-0015.5' but produced
'00-15.5'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test8246: expected
'-000007' but produced
'00000-7'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test8274: expected
'-000007' but produced
'00000-7'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test8277: expected
'-0007' but produced
'000-7'
FAILURE: printf/test.fsx - test test8281: expected
'-7 ' but produced
'-700000'

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 29, 2013

This is incorrect, I was running the test against F# 3.0 FSharp.Core.dll

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Nov 29, 2013
enricosada pushed a commit to enricosada/fsharp that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2015
Added support for identifying an expanded set of special files as inputs that were not captures before (e.g. App.config files)
Added support for properly identifying synthetic grouped reference nodes (and COM reference nodes) as inputs (e.g. those used to reference full portable .NET subset) (changeset 1381885)
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants