Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"A strongly-named assembly is required" #66

Open
goswinr opened this issue Mar 16, 2017 · 8 comments
Open

"A strongly-named assembly is required" #66

goswinr opened this issue Mar 16, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@goswinr
Copy link

goswinr commented Mar 16, 2017

using "F# Empty Windows App (WPF)" template (version 2.0) :
I create an new project and update all nuget packages.
I then get the error "A strongly-named assembly is required" on the type provider.
see images.
Is this a problem with my setup ? Is this something I can fix directly?

(using VS2015 update 3)
2017-03-16_174025
2017-03-16_173955

@ReedCopsey
Copy link
Member

ReedCopsey commented Mar 16, 2017 via email

@goswinr
Copy link
Author

goswinr commented Mar 16, 2017

Yes, the Error goes away after disabling the power tools. Is that the only solution ?

@ReedCopsey
Copy link
Member

ReedCopsey commented Mar 16, 2017 via email

@goswinr
Copy link
Author

goswinr commented Mar 16, 2017

I have some other errors now but i think I can manage those. seems the FsViewModule API has changed.
2017-03-16_180713

@ReedCopsey
Copy link
Member

ReedCopsey commented Mar 16, 2017 via email

@goswinr
Copy link
Author

goswinr commented Mar 16, 2017

OK, many thanks for your fast reply Reed!

@brianberns
Copy link

Just curious what the status of this issue is. Since it interferes with Intellisense, it makes development with FsXaml much more difficult. (And I don't want to disable F# Power Tools, since that would also make development more difficult.)

@gdennie
Copy link

gdennie commented Nov 25, 2017

Developing on VS2015 targeting .net framework v4.6.1 and runtime FSharp.Core v4.4.0, I was able to get FsXaml to work by replacing v3.1.6 with v3.0.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants