BUG?: update with any of the --keep-?? flags doesn't honour content:none in paket.dependencies

[pms1969]

Description

Not sure if it's a bug, expected behaviour or something else. But if I do a paket update --keep-major when I have specified content:none for a package in paket.dependencies, I end up with the contents being copied to the project folder and the csproj being updated. Running paket update again removes the files as expected.

Repro steps

Please provide the steps required to reproduce the problem

1. create an empty solution with an bare class library project
2. paket init
3. paket add nuget bootstrap project <projectname>
4. note the addition of the content files to the project (folders contents, fonts, scripts)
5. edit paket.dependencies and place content:none next to bootstrap
6. paket update
7. note the contents have been removed from the project
8. paket update --keep-major
9. note the contents are back.

Expected behavior

at step 9, the project should not contain the contents of the bootstrap package

Actual behavior

It does

Known workarounds

update the package.references file to include content:none for the package as well

Related information

• Operating system: Windows 7
• Branch : paket version 2.65.2.0
• .NET Runtime, CoreCLR or Mono Version: 4.5
• Performance information, links to performance testing scripts

[forki]

can you please send me the project after step 7? I can't reproduce

[pms1969]

I'll have to do it on my way home @forki . Corporate policy dictates. :-s Should be about an hour and a half. Direct to your email ok?

[forki]

Yes that would be great. Or put it here as a zip. Both works for me. Thanks
On May 23, 2016 16:35, "Paul Saunders" notifications@github.com wrote:

I'll have to do it on my way home @forki https://github.com/forki .
Corporate policy dictates. :-s Should be about an hour and a half. Direct
to your email ok?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1701 (comment)

[pms1969]

ok, can add as zip, hadn't spotted that.
TestPaket.zip

[forki]

Ok I can reproduce with that. thanks

[forki]

should be flying again

[isaacabraham]

lol. genius.

[forki]

Puhh at least someone understood. ;-)

[pms1969]

Excellent work. Thanks. And yes, I think it was understood all round. ;-)