Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds bin/setup and Procfile #88

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Nov 8, 2016
Merged

Adds bin/setup and Procfile #88

merged 3 commits into from Nov 8, 2016

Conversation

amoose
Copy link
Member

@amoose amoose commented Nov 2, 2016

Includes bin/setup and Procfile from my original PR

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 2, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 93.578% when pulling d6b407b on amos/fix/setup into e4f245c on dev.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 93.578% when pulling c99a928 on amos/fix/setup into c6757f5 on dev.

@amoose amoose mentioned this pull request Nov 2, 2016
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 93.578% when pulling 91c6705 on amos/fix/setup into c6757f5 on dev.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 93.578% when pulling 91c6705 on amos/fix/setup into c6757f5 on dev.

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
web: bundle exec puma -t 5:5 -p ${PORT:-3000} -e ${RACK_ENV:-development}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We also have this configuration in config/puma.rb, using it in bin/cf-start.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Procfile is required for foreman and Heroku; does this collide with config/puma.rb ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What I'm suggesting is something like:

web: bundle exec puma -C config/puma.rb

...as in bin/cf-start.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AH -- yes, I think that is the correct approach. I will update!

@amoose amoose added the WIP label Nov 3, 2016
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 93.578% when pulling d5f8e3c on amos/fix/setup into c6757f5 on dev.

@amoose
Copy link
Member Author

amoose commented Nov 8, 2016

Updated Procfile @jmcarp and tested on Heroku 🚀

@amoose amoose removed the WIP label Nov 8, 2016
@amoose amoose merged commit 020d71f into dev Nov 8, 2016
@amoose amoose deleted the amos/fix/setup branch November 8, 2016 18:02
line47 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2017
* Adds bin/setup and procfile

* Updates README formatting

* Updates Procfile to read from puma.rb
jgrevich pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2017
* Adds bin/setup and procfile

* Updates README formatting

* Updates Procfile to read from puma.rb
amoose added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2017
* Adds bin/setup and procfile

* Updates README formatting

* Updates Procfile to read from puma.rb
amoose added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2017
* Adds bin/setup and procfile

* Updates README formatting

* Updates Procfile to read from puma.rb
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants