Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

constraint solver error #189

Closed
hanfeng0114 opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

constraint solver error #189

hanfeng0114 opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@hanfeng0114
Copy link

Hi

As #188 said, I tried random sized list:

` def test_group_size(self):
@vsc.randobj
class ThreadGroupConstraintItem():
def init(self, aThreadNum, aSharePercent):
self.mThreadNum = aThreadNum
self.mSharePercent = aSharePercent

            self.mSharePercentGoal = self.mSharePercent
            self.mSharePercentDelta = 10
            self.mSharePercentGoalMin = 0
            self.mSharePercentGoalMax = 0
            self._genSharePrecent()
            self.mSharePercentGoalMinConstr =  vsc.rand_uint16_t(0)
            self.mSharePercentGoalMaxConstr =  vsc.rand_uint16_t(0)
            self.mGroupSize = vsc.rand_uint16_t(0)
            self.GroupList = vsc.randsz_list_t(vsc.rand_uint16_t())
            self.GroupListScore = vsc.randsz_list_t(vsc.rand_uint16_t())
        
        @vsc.constraint
        def basic_c(self):
            self.mGroupSize < self.mThreadNum
            self.mGroupSize > 0
            self.GroupList.size == self.mGroupSize
            self.GroupListScore.size == self.mGroupSize
            # self.GroupListSum == self.GroupList.sum
            # self.GroupList.sum == self.GroupListSum 
            # self.GroupListSum == self.mThreadNum
            with vsc.foreach(self.GroupList, idx=True, it=False) as idx:
                self.GroupList[idx]<= self.mThreadNum
                self.GroupList[idx]>0
            with vsc.foreach(self.GroupList, idx=True, it=False) as idx:
                with vsc.if_then(self.GroupList[idx] > 1):
                    self.GroupListScore[idx] == 1
                with vsc.else_then():
                    self.GroupListScore[idx] == 0
            self.GroupList.sum == self.mThreadNum
            # self.mSharePercentGoalMinConstr == self.mSharePercentGoalMin
            # self.mSharePercentGoalMaxConstr == self.mSharePercentGoalMax
            # self.GroupListScore.sum/self.mGroupSize < int(self.mSharePercentGoalMax/100)
            # self.GroupListScore.sum/self.mGroupSize > int(self.mSharePercentGoalMin/100)

        def _genSharePrecent(self):
            """generate share percent min/max
            """
            if self.mSharePercent > self.mSharePercentDelta:
                self.mSharePercentMin = self.mSharePercent - self.mSharePercentDelta
            else:
                self.mSharePercentMin = 0

            if self.mSharePercent < 100 - self.mSharePercentDelta:
                self.mSharePercentMax = self.mSharePercent + self.mSharePercentDelta
            else:
                self.mSharePercentMax = 100
        

    my_obj_rand = ThreadGroupConstraintItem(8, 80)
    for i in range(10):
        print("Iter %d", i)
        # my_obj_rand.randomize()
        with vsc.randomize_with(my_obj_rand):
            my_obj_rand.GroupList.sum == my_obj_rand.mThreadNum
        print("Thread_num: %0d, GroupList.sum: %d" % (my_obj_rand.mThreadNum, sum(my_obj_rand.GroupList)))
        for i,it in enumerate(my_obj_rand.GroupList):
            print("GroupList[%d]: %d" % (i, it))
            print("GroupListScore[%d]: %d" % (i, my_obj_rand.GroupListScore[i]))

`
The output is not as expected: mThreadNum is 8, but GroupList.sum != mThreadNum:
test_randsz_array.py size: 16
.Iter %d 0
Thread_num: 8, GroupList.sum: 17
GroupList[0]: 1
GroupListScore[0]: 0
GroupList[1]: 5
GroupListScore[1]: 1
GroupList[2]: 8
GroupListScore[2]: 1
GroupList[3]: 1
GroupListScore[3]: 0
GroupList[4]: 2
GroupListScore[4]: 1
Iter %d 1
Thread_num: 8, GroupList.sum: 1
GroupList[0]: 1
GroupListScore[0]: 0
Iter %d 2
Thread_num: 8, GroupList.sum: 8
GroupList[0]: 8
GroupListScore[0]: 1
Iter %d 3
Thread_num: 8, GroupList.sum: 11
GroupList[0]: 8
GroupListScore[0]: 1
GroupList[1]: 3
GroupListScore[1]: 1
Iter %d 4
Thread_num: 8, GroupList.sum: 1
GroupList[0]: 1
GroupListScore[0]: 0
Iter %d 5
Thread_num: 8, GroupList.sum: 30
GroupList[0]: 8
GroupListScore[0]: 1
GroupList[1]: 8
GroupListScore[1]: 1
GroupList[2]: 1
GroupListScore[2]: 0
GroupList[3]: 6
GroupListScore[3]: 1
GroupList[4]: 3
GroupListScore[4]: 1
GroupList[5]: 4
GroupListScore[5]: 1
Iter %d 6
Thread_num: 8, GroupList.sum: 1
GroupList[0]: 1
GroupListScore[0]: 0
Iter %d 7
Thread_num: 8, GroupList.sum: 26
GroupList[0]: 8
GroupListScore[0]: 1
GroupList[1]: 2
GroupListScore[1]: 1
GroupList[2]: 4
GroupListScore[2]: 1
GroupList[3]: 6
GroupListScore[3]: 1
GroupList[4]: 6
GroupListScore[4]: 1
Iter %d 8
Thread_num: 8, GroupList.sum: 2
GroupList[0]: 2
GroupListScore[0]: 1
Iter %d 9
Thread_num: 8, GroupList.sum: 33
GroupList[0]: 8
GroupListScore[0]: 1
GroupList[1]: 3
GroupListScore[1]: 1
GroupList[2]: 1
GroupListScore[2]: 0
GroupList[3]: 8
GroupListScore[3]: 1
GroupList[4]: 8
GroupListScore[4]: 1
GroupList[5]: 5
GroupListScore[5]: 1
.Size: 4
.

mballance added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2023
- (#189) - Correct an issue with how arrays with constraints on sum are
  grouped into rand sets.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Ballance <matt.ballance@gmail.com>
@mballance
Copy link
Member

Thanks, the testcase is very helpful. After investigating, it seems that constraints involving array sum were not being properly grouped for solving. Specifically, the sum constraint wasn't causing all array elements to be solved together. The 0.8.5 release contains a fix that allows this testcase to pass.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants