Refactor gulpfile.js
#137
Merged
Refactor gulpfile.js
#137
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Raruto
added
config
Raruto
commented
Aug 12, 2022
# Conflicts: # gulpfile.js
Simplify tasks: we use only dev and build task without specify if we wold like to create app and vendors files.
|
@volterra79 if that's okay with you I'd say we can quite safely merge this. |
volterra79
approved these changes
Aug 23, 2022
This was referenced Aug 23, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
a partial refactor is actually needed (or at least suggested) before complete #68
based on #35
Notable changes:
interpolateVersion()set_current_hash_version()g3w-admin:client_onlyset_build_all_to_falseg3w_admin_version