fix(require-param): reporting all missing jsdoc params #348
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 15.5.4 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
brettz9
added a commit
to interfaced/eslint-plugin-jsdoc
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2019
* master: feat: add fixer for no-types (gajus#350) fix(check-param-names): ensure polyfilling `Object.entries` for Node 6 fix(check-param-names): provide fixer duplicate param names (remove extra); partial fix for gajus#47 chore(npm): update deps (comment-parser, lodash) and devDep (husky, mocha) fix(require-param): reporting all missing jsdoc params (gajus#348) docs(check-examples): fix heading level docs(readme): remove section "Reference to jscs-jsdoc" chore: update Babel devDeps
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the fixing, what i mentioned in #347
If there is no reason not to fix it
I think this change is reasonable.
But If there are specific reasons, please ignore this PR. Thanks!