Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(block): add Randomness when using celo #44

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 2, 2020
Merged

fix(block): add Randomness when using celo #44

merged 2 commits into from Jul 2, 2020

Conversation

gakonst
Copy link
Owner

@gakonst gakonst commented Jul 2, 2020

Also do not compile the fields which were removed in celo-org/celo-blockchain#913

Motivation

Celo blocks failed to deserialize.

Solution

Added the missing randomness field (they run a RANDAO commit reveal per block) and removed the fields which they do not use.

@gakonst gakonst merged commit 1cbd86d into master Jul 2, 2020
@gakonst gakonst deleted the fix/celo branch July 2, 2020 13:05
meetmangukiya pushed a commit to meetmangukiya/ethers-rs that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2022
* feat(evm): allow providing low level encoded calldata

* feat(dapp): add proptest calldata fuzzing strat

* chore(evm): cargo fmt

* feat(sputnik): implement Clone for Executor

* chore: use patch directive to manage sputnik version

* feat(evmodin): derive Clone for EvmOdin

* feat(fuzz): add more types for fuzzing

* test: add fuzzing test

* feat(runner): fuzz test sol funcs with >0 args using proptest

* chore: use patched evmodin until merged

* chore: fix dapptools cli

* feat: allow configuring the fuzzer at the creation of the test runners

* feat: add counterexample generation and test shrinking

* fix: disable fuzzer in multi runner

* feat(cli): enable fuzzing

* fix(fuzz): change test case to be more reliable with 2 uints

testing the shrinking of varlen strings is flaky because the fuzzer may be
able to produce the optimal string length by chance in the first iteration
because the test case is quite narrow
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant