Add TRANSDEGREES to obsoletes (used by CTblLib) #1852
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fingolfin
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2017
olexandr-konovalov
added
the
release notes: added
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is extracted from #1650, since it can be merged independently and fix tests that use CTblLib.
I've discovered that TransGrp breaks CTblLib, because @hulpke replaced TRANSDEGREES with the boolean list TRANSAVAILABLE. What is completely sensible, of course, since there is no more continuous availability of degrees, due to degree 32 requiring a separate download.
I've added TRANSDEGREES to obsolete.gd and explained the situation in the comment there. I will notify @ThomasBreuer subject to passing tests and merging this, so that he can eventually adjust CTblLib for the new TransGrp package.
Remark: there is no urgency at the moment to adjust CTblLib, and perhaps in the future
TransGrpwill have a better API - see e.g. hulpke/transgrp#13