Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for writing to ERROR_OUTPUT from kernel code #3043

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 29, 2018

Conversation

embray
Copy link
Contributor

@embray embray commented Nov 22, 2018

#2824 added a global variable called ERROR_OUTPUT to lib/error.g, which can be manipulated to control the file/stream that error output is sent to by the error library. This works for most cases; however, code in the kernel that outputs error messages ought also to write to whatever ERROR_OUTPUT points to, rather than defaulting to `"errout".

The one case I found this to be an issue was in printing syntax errors, though there may be other cases.

This is my first attempt to work around it, and my first addition of new code to GAP, so please be kind--I've tried my best to observe and follow local conventions, etc.

One problem with this PR I'm aware of currently is that when using ImportGVarFromLibrary, it sets that global variable as read-only by default, which was not previously the case for ERROR_OUTPUT. I'm not exactly sure why it does this, as it is still possible to set the variable read-write afterwards. This may be a good change though. It would prevent accidental clobbering of ERROR_OUTPUT: In order to change it you really have to mean it. I've seen this pattern in use in a couple of packages when overriding ErrorInner as well, so there is precedent for it. But I don't know whether or not that's considered an anti-pattern.

file/stream referenced by the ERROR_OUTPUT global variable
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #3043 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 69.23%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3043      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.78%   83.78%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         685      685              
  Lines      343377   343389      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits       287694   287702       +8     
- Misses      55683    55687       +4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/error.h 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/scanner.c 91.64% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/error.c 85.27% <66.66%> (-0.91%) ⬇️

Copy link
Member

@fingolfin fingolfin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! On a first glance, this seems quite sensible to me, but I'd like to think a bit more about. Also, I hope @markuspf and @ChrisJefferson and others will have a look, too :-).

src/error.c Outdated
/* It may be we already tried and failed to open *errout* above but
* but this is an extreme case so it can't hurt to try again
* anyways */
if ((ret = OpenOutput("*errout*"))) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't assign inside the if, i.e., first assign, then test.

src/error.c Outdated
ret = OpenOutput(CONST_CSTR_STRING(ERROR_OUTPUT));
}
else {
ret = OpenOutputStream(ERROR_OUTPUT);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We started to add more validation, and here, one could verify that ERROR_OUTPUT actually is a stream; see e.g. PRINT_OR_APPEND_TO_FILE_OR_STREAM.

On that note, perhaps it would be "better" to put this new function into streams.c or io.c...; but I have no strong conviction in either direction, and in any case, it's not hard to move a function to another file later on, should we feel the need for it :-).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wanted to check that it was actually a stream, but I couldn't quickly find the "right" way to check that. Is there a TNUM for stream objects? I'll look at those functions you mentioned.

I agree this function might make more sense in a io.c. I put it in error.c because that was already loading another global variable from error.g. I don't know if that entirely matters though: The connection between the C-based modules and the GAP language library modules is one that I haven't deeply explored yet and is unclear to me.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general, TNUMs only cover a very small, hard-wired list of types with special representations in the GAP kernel (things like integers, booleans, permutations). For things like streams, you want to use the more general IsOutputStream. As Max mentioned, you can see how to get this GAP level variable, and copy a reference to it into C, in PRINT_OR_APPEND_TO_FILE_OR_STREAM

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, clearly I did not even test my last commit. I'm just going to delete it.

@embray
Copy link
Contributor Author

embray commented Nov 23, 2018

I noticed that the JupyterKernel package already relies on setting ERROR_OUTPUT in order to capture error output. So the fact that ImportGVarFromLibrary sets that global variable to read-only by default would break that.

I still think it's reasonable behavior that it does that. But if this change is accepted we should either updated the JupyterKernel code, or just keep this variable read/write by default (and in that case, what would be the best way to do that after ImportGVarFromLibrary?)

@ssiccha
Copy link
Contributor

ssiccha commented Nov 23, 2018

Hi @embray. I like this. I didn't know how the scanner works, so I only took care of ErrorInner in #2824. :) Since the new function is equivalent to what happens at the beginning of FuncPRINT_CURRENT_STATEMENT, we can then also delete that code and call the new function there once this is merged.

@ssiccha
Copy link
Contributor

ssiccha commented Nov 23, 2018

About the role of ERROR_OUTPUT: There is no particular reason that I introduced it as a GAP-level global variable. Unless there is some reason against it, maybe a better way of protecting it would be to let it be a C-level Obj later and provide a SET_ERROR_OUTPUT function? Then for now we could adapt the JupyterKernel.

@embray
Copy link
Contributor Author

embray commented Nov 26, 2018

@ssiccha

Since the new function is equivalent to what happens at the beginning of FuncPRINT_CURRENT_STATEMENT

It isn't exactly equivalent, since that looks at an arbitrary stream object (in practice it is often the ERROR_INPUT which is passed here by ErrorInner in error.g, but that need not be the case for sure.

But I could refactor a bit more to eliminate that duplicate code. I don't know how much you all care about moving around GAP kernel internal functions that aren't directly accessible from GAP code, given that there is not officially an "API" as such (outside of the the new one that's being added...)

@fingolfin
Copy link
Member

Don't worry about FuncPRINT_CURRENT_STATEMENT. That's a function that grew from a minor, very crash hack to a much bigger thing, that we now should refactor (e.g. I'd like to make it resp. a variant of it easy to call from within gdb to help with debugging). But all that can and should be done in a separate PR.

@markuspf
Copy link
Member

One problem with this PR I'm aware of currently is that when using ImportGVarFromLibrary, it sets that global variable as read-only by default, which was not previously the case for ERROR_OUTPUT. I'm not exactly sure why it does this, as it is still possible to set the variable read-write afterwards.

I think this is in some sense entirely coincidental. ERROR_OUTPUT is introduced in the library by assignment (i.e. ERROR_OUTPUT := "*errout*"), which makes it a read-write global. ImportGVarFromLibrary just enters the global variable into a list of global variables which are by default read only.
One could view this as a bug in the library which should really have used BindGlobal("ERROR_OUTPUT", "*errout*"); to introduce this variable as a proper global.

This may be a good change though. It would prevent accidental clobbering of ERROR_OUTPUT: In order to change it you really have to mean it. I've seen this pattern in use in a couple of packages when overriding ErrorInner as well, so there is precedent for it. But I don't know whether or not that's considered an anti-pattern.

There might even be a point in introducing a setter function for error output (later). It might indeed be a good idea to have ERROR_OUTPUT read only by default.

I'd just like someone (@ssicha?) to make a matching PR for JupyterKernel as to not break it, some people seem to be using it now.

Copy link
Contributor

@ssiccha ssiccha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've tried it with jupyter and got it to work. All other points raised in the discussion can be addressed in different issues and PRs. LGTM 👍

@ssiccha
Copy link
Contributor

ssiccha commented Nov 27, 2018

Also I opened a corresponding PR gap-packages/JupyterKernel#85.

@markuspf
Copy link
Member

I just merged #78 on JupyterKernel so I am fine with merging this.

Copy link
Member

@fingolfin fingolfin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine then, let's merge this once the build queue for master has cleared.

@olexandr-konovalov
Copy link
Member

Did we agree to backport this to stable-4.10 branch?

@fingolfin
Copy link
Member

Backported via de7b9b9

@olexandr-konovalov olexandr-konovalov added the release notes: added PRs introducing changes that have since been mentioned in the release notes label Feb 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-to-4.10-DONE release notes: added PRs introducing changes that have since been mentioned in the release notes topic: kernel
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants