Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make SetUserPreferences obsolete #512

Merged

Conversation

markuspf
Copy link
Member

It should be removed in 4.9

@markuspf markuspf added the gapsagedays2016 Issues and PRs that arose at https://www.gapdays.de/gap-sage-days2016 label Jan 21, 2016
@ChrisJefferson
Copy link
Contributor

This looks OK to me (but obviously conflicts need fixing)

@olexandr-konovalov
Copy link
Member

To me to - discussed in #508

local name, record;

Info( InfoWarning, 1, "");
Info( InfoWarning, 1, Concatenation( [
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this use InfoObsolete (I know you just moved it, but this would be a logical change to apply next, wouldn't it?

@markuspf
Copy link
Member Author

Done. That was an oversight on my part, I didn't realise that there was a InfoObsolete infoclass.

olexandr-konovalov pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2016
@olexandr-konovalov olexandr-konovalov merged commit 54cc947 into gap-system:master Jan 28, 2016
@markuspf markuspf deleted the obsolete-setuserpreference branch February 5, 2017 12:31
@olexandr-konovalov olexandr-konovalov added the release notes: added PRs introducing changes that have since been mentioned in the release notes label Jan 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
gapsagedays2016 Issues and PRs that arose at https://www.gapdays.de/gap-sage-days2016 release notes: added PRs introducing changes that have since been mentioned in the release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants