chore(gatsby-plugin-mdx): Fix grammar #33485
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I'm not an English native speaker but with this phrasing it sounds more natural to me. Would be nice to have a native speaker look over the proposal. Before the first edit I didn't notice any error but I've read it from the beginning. I think I got what I came for after the last edit I'm suggesting here, so I didn't read further. Thanks a lot for the helpful documentation!
gatsbot
bot
added
the
status: triage needed
LekoArts
added
type: documentation
LekoArts
changed the title
wardpeet
pushed a commit
to herecydev/gatsby
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2021
axe312ger
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm not an English native speaker but with this phrasing it sounds more natural to me. Would be nice to have a native speaker look over the proposal.
Before the first edit I didn't notice any error but I've read it from the beginning. I think I got what I came for after the last edit I'm suggesting here, so I didn't read further. Thanks a lot for the helpful documentation!
Description
Documentation
Related Issues