Remove Glitches and exploits sub category

[avivace]

discord thread

[3:50 PM] luckytyphlosion: pls remove asm hacks
[3:50 PM] luckytyphlosion: like the ACE shit
[3:50 PM] avivace: Why it doesn't fit, for you?
[3:51 PM] avivace: The list has plenty of not stritcly "development" resources targeted on hacking the console, the existing software/hardware
[3:51 PM] avivace: And I think it makes sense
[3:53 PM] luckytyphlosion: the yellow debug asm hack isn't even a glitch/exploit
[3:53 PM] luckytyphlosion: it's a binary romhack
[3:53 PM] luckytyphlosion: DMA hijacking is modern enough to go under the radar
[3:54 PM] luckytyphlosion: but the point is, this really doesn't fit on gbdev
[3:54 PM] luckytyphlosion: what counts as Glitches and exploits
[3:54 PM] luckytyphlosion: do we need to link all the pokemon TASes or other game boy TASes which use ACE
[3:55 PM] luckytyphlosion: most of the glitchy ACE stuff you will see will mostly be from pokemon, since that's the most understood GB game
[3:55 PM] avivace: I was sure the Yellow Hack was injecting something, and not editing the ROM before
[3:55 PM] luckytyphlosion: it is an edit
[3:55 PM] avivace: I see, you are indeed right
[3:56 PM] luckytyphlosion:

[3:58 PM] luckytyphlosion: anyway, if Glitches and exploits stay, then I want to use that section to advertise my two ACE setups that have gotten no attention because having them get attention would require growing a youtube channel and people are too drunk on 8F
[3:59 PM] avivace: I'll move it in MORE and in case we can remove it from there, too. (Also cc-ing @ISSOtm for an opinion on this)
[4:05 PM] avivace: At this point that section makes no sense
[4:05 PM] avivace: IF we don't start listing ACE techniques(edited)
[4:05 PM] luckytyphlosion: it will just turn into a pokemon glitch section
[4:06 PM] luckytyphlosion: there are like 3000 ways to get ACE in pokemon
[4:06 PM] avivace: I mean, acquiring ACE, as in ACE setups
[4:09 PM] luckytyphlosion: yes, still 3000
[4:12 PM] avivace: If this is true, no sense in keeping them (not in the main list)
[4:12 PM] avivace: I'll just keep the article by ISSO