New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop phantom fields? #806
Labels
Milestone
Comments
Yeah, let's try to drop them. However I won't be able to test the changes in production env/projects soon. |
I can try on our code base this week. |
gcanti
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2019
gcanti
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2019
gcanti
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 25, 2019
gcanti
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 25, 2019
gcanti
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 26, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
@sledorze @raveclassic the internals of
fp-ts
don't rely on the presence on those phantom fields anymore (_A
,_L
, etc...), do we want to try to remove themand ship versionin future releases? This would allow to test this change in the wild (and overall it's quite easy to revert in case of issues)1.16
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: