May 2020 Hardfork #348
Merged
May 2020 Hardfork #348
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zquestz
reviewed
Apr 20, 2020
|
We should also bump the version in this PR. |
zquestz
reviewed
Apr 20, 2020
|
Overall this looks good. We probably need a few more eyeballs on it, also need to figure out a testnet testing strategy to make sure we can test as much as we can before the upgrade. |
cpacia
force-pushed
the
hardfork
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ab98d41
to
c1d44d5
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hardfork activation
New sigcheck accounting
Sig check tests
Update block template generation with sigchecks.
OP_REVERSEBYTES
OP_REVERSEBYTES tests