Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Make pr30957-1.c pass rather xfail
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
2015-02-22  Tom de Vries  <tom@codesourcery.com>

	* gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c: Make pr30957-1.c pass rather xfail.

From-SVN: r220893
  • Loading branch information
Tom de Vries authored and Tom de Vries committed Feb 22, 2015
1 parent 42924e4 commit ffefa92
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 15 additions and 11 deletions.
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2015-02-22 Tom de Vries <tom@codesourcery.com>

* gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c: Make pr30957-1.c pass rather xfail.

2015-02-21 Arnaud Charlet <charlet@adacore.com>

PR ada/65156
Expand Down
22 changes: 11 additions & 11 deletions gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,12 +1,9 @@
/* { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } } */
/* We don't (and don't want to) perform this optimisation on soft-float
targets, where each addition is a library call. This test requires
-fassociative-math for enabling the variable-expansion as well as
-fsigned-zeros for honoring the sign of zero; but
they can not co-exist; also under -funsafe-math-optimizations, so we
expect it to fail. */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* We don't (and don't want to) perform this optimisation on soft-float targets,
where each addition is a library call. /
/* { dg-require-effective-target hard_float } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -funroll-loops -funsafe-math-optimizations -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll" } */
/* -fassociative-math requires -fno-trapping-math and -fno-signed-zeros. */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -funroll-loops -fassociative-math -fno-trapping-math -fno-signed-zeros -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll" } */

extern void abort (void);
extern void exit (int);
Expand All @@ -26,12 +23,15 @@ foo (float d, int n)
int
main ()
{
if (__builtin_copysignf (1.0, foo (0.0 / -5.0, 10)) != -1.0)
/* When compiling standard compliant we expect foo to return -0.0. But the
variable expansion during unrolling optimization (for this testcase enabled
by non-compliant -fassociative-math) instantiates copy(s) of the
accumulator which it initializes with +0.0. Hence we expect that foo
returns +0.0. */
if (__builtin_copysignf (1.0, foo (0.0 / -5.0, 10)) != 1.0)
abort ();
exit (0);
}

/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "Expanding Accumulator" "loop2_unroll" } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-rtl-dump "loop*" } } */


0 comments on commit ffefa92

Please sign in to comment.