Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve meep docs #650

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Aug 31, 2022
Merged

improve meep docs #650

merged 2 commits into from Aug 31, 2022

Conversation

joamatab
Copy link
Contributor

  • improve meep docs
  • fix docstring return message for meep simulation

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Aug 31, 2022

Sourcery Code Quality Report

Merging this PR leaves code quality unchanged.

Quality metrics Before After Change
Complexity 28.86 😞 28.86 😞 0.00
Method Length 245.62 ⛔ 245.62 ⛔ 0.00
Working memory 6.38 🙂 6.38 🙂 0.00
Quality 26.80% 😞 26.80% 😞 0.00%
Other metrics Before After Change
Lines 720 727 7
Changed files Quality Before Quality After Quality Change
gdsfactory/simulation/gmeep/write_sparameters_meep.py 25.60% 😞 25.60% 😞 0.00%
gdsfactory/simulation/gmeep/write_sparameters_meep_batch.py 29.66% 😞 29.66% 😞 0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File Function Complexity Length Working Memory Quality Recommendation
gdsfactory/simulation/gmeep/write_sparameters_meep.py write_sparameters_meep 47 ⛔ 910 ⛔ 5.64% ⛔ Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods
gdsfactory/simulation/gmeep/write_sparameters_meep_batch.py write_sparameters_meep_batch 23 😞 365 ⛔ 16 ⛔ 22.67% ⛔ Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
gdsfactory/simulation/gmeep/write_sparameters_meep.py parse_port_eigenmode_coeff 6 ⭐ 177 😞 13 😞 49.16% 😞 Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

  • ⭐ excellent
  • 🙂 good
  • 😞 poor
  • ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.


Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 31, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant