You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I believe that the sign is incorrect in the parameterisation linking the generalized Gumbel distribution to its parent gamma-exponential distribution (8.4). Should it not be: GenGumbel(x; u, λ, n) = GammaExp(x; u + λ \ln n, λ, ν)? Version 1.0.0 of the field guide has a minus sign.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…ts parent gamma-exponential distribution (8.4). Resolve issue #13. Kudos: John Ashley Burgoyne @jaburgoyne (#14)
* Fix parameterisation linking the generalized Gumbel distribution to its parent gamma-exponential distribution (8.4). Resolve issue #13.
Kudos: John Ashley Burgoyne @jaburgoyne
I believe that the sign is incorrect in the parameterisation linking the generalized Gumbel distribution to its parent gamma-exponential distribution (8.4). Should it not be: GenGumbel(x; u, λ, n) = GammaExp(x; u + λ \ln n, λ, ν)? Version 1.0.0 of the field guide has a minus sign.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: