-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test tombstoning PR against ACD installation from #3 #7
Comments
So my quick idea of:
Does not work, because the patch paths are for ansible src, which has an extra
The above file would be, instead I could maybe go up two directories (so be inside the How does one manage patches to pip-installed packages? Or is there a better way to test ACD right now so I can test with that patch? Or could I just test |
Issue #7: Attempt to patch ansible ACD installation with PR 67684.
I asked @abadger if he could get the tombstoning PR incorporated into the ACD distro I was installing from https://toshio.fedorapeople.org/ansible/acd/, and after that, it seems like everything works just fine, woohoo! @s-hertel also mentioned that this playbook was working fine after applying that PR locally. So now the main blocker is #12, so moving efforts there. |
In #3 I got ACD installing (a very preliminary pre-build) and am using that to test the 2.9-era playbook (making sure modules and roles still work correctly).
However, ACD is currently failing because it needs this (ansible/ansible#67684) tombstoning/redirection PR in place to resolve the modules to the proper locations.
I'm not sure if that PR works or not, yet, but having a test playbook like this one should ensure there's some form of CI against it using an external playbook. I just need to figure out how to get that PR integrated with what I'm building for ACD...
Currently the ACD build fails with:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: